The method

When life gets in the way of training

Don't make up what you missed. In a hard week, drop the intense session first and keep moving most days, even briefly. After a break, measure your return against the last month, not against where you stopped. Below is how that works for bad sleep, missed weeks, illness and travel, and what each point rests on.

Reviewed in September 2026 against current research. Sources are listed at the end.

Notes alongside the text say what each point rests on:

Well supportedreviews or large studies agree
Some evidencesmaller studies or expert consensus
Our practiceexperience and reasoning, not tested

The same session isn't the same load every week

A training plan assumes you arrive at every session with roughly the same capacity to absorb it. You don't. A week of five-hour nights, a deadline and a child with a fever uses up much of what you'd normally spend recovering from training. Your body doesn't keep separate accounts for work stress and interval sessions. It's one budget.

So an interval session that builds you up in an ordinary week can simply dig a hole in a bad one. The workout on paper is identical; what it costs you is not. That's why we adjust training to the week you're actually having, rather than asking you to keep pace with a calendar written in advance.

What we look at before changing anything

Most of the signals that matter don't need a device.

  • Sleep over the last few nights, not just last night. One bad night costs something on the day. Three in a row change the week.

  • How easy effort feels. When your usual easy run or ride feels heavy, or your heart rate sits higher than normal at that effort, you haven't recovered from what you've already done. It's the most honest signal there is.

  • Resting heart rate or HRV, if you already track them. Several mornings in a row noticeably off your normal say more than any single reading.

  • How you feel about training. Being tired but feeling better ten minutes in is normal. Dreading every session for a week is not.

None of these is a verdict on its own. Taken together, and set against what you've told us about your week, they're usually clear enough.

What goes first when the week gets tight

  1. The hard session, for this week. It costs the most recovery and gives the least when you're already short of it. One week without intensity loses next to nothing.

  2. The length of the long session, not the session itself. Ninety minutes instead of two and a half hours still keeps long, steady work in your week.

  3. Frequency, last of all. Twenty easy minutes on a bad day keep the thread going. The habit of moving most days is the hardest thing to rebuild once it's gone, so we protect it before anything else.

Over months, the order turns around. The same research that makes intensity cheap to skip for a week says it's the one thing you can't drop for long. Frequency and session length can shrink a lot and fitness holds; lower the intensity and it goes. That's why hard work stays in every ordinary week, in small doses.

A useful rule of thumb: a short easy session is almost never the wrong call, and a hard one on four hours of sleep almost always is.

Don't make up missed sessions

When sessions fall out of a week, they're gone. Moving three missed workouts into Saturday and Sunday turns an ordinary weekend into the hardest two days of your month, on a body that has just had a rough week. The danger isn't the weekly total. It's the single session that is suddenly much longer than anything you've done lately.

So the reference point is your longest session in the last 30 days, not the one you did before the gap. What we do next depends on how long the gap was.

  • A few days. Carry on with the week as if nothing happened. Nothing has.

  • One to two weeks. Some fitness goes, but less than it feels, and the base is still there. The first week back is shorter and entirely easy, and intensity returns in a few weeks.

  • A month or more. We start from what you can do now, not from what you used to do. After a month off, the last 30 days hold almost nothing, so your old long session has become a large spike. And heart and lungs come back faster than tendons do, so you'll feel ready for more before your legs are. That gap between feeling ready and being ready is why the first weeks back feel too easy on purpose.

Illness

This is the one area where we don't negotiate.

  • A fever, anything in the chest, or aching and unwell all over: no training at all, not even something easy.

  • A head cold without a fever: easy movement is fine if it leaves you feeling better rather than worse. If in doubt, rest.

  • Coming back: start short and easy, and step up only if the symptoms stay away. The more of your body the illness involved, the longer the way back usually is.

If after an illness your heart rate at easy effort is unusually high, or you notice chest pain, palpitations or breathlessness you can't explain, stop and see a doctor before going any further. That's a question for a doctor, not for us.

Travel

A work trip isn't a gap in training. It's a different week.

  • Walking counts. A day on your feet in a new city is real aerobic work, especially in a week without much else.

  • Strength needs a floor and nothing else. Twenty minutes in a hotel room is enough to keep it ticking over.

  • An easy run is one of the better ways to see a place. Keep it easy; the city will still be there tomorrow.

  • After a long flight or a big time-zone shift, the first day is easy or off. Jet lag is a load in its own right.

Sometimes a trip is the opposite of a gap: a week near hills, open water or snow is a chance for work you can't do at home.

One week, as planned and as it went

Here's a composite of a very ordinary week: about seven hours available, with running, cycling and strength.

Day Planned What happened What we did
Mon Strength, 40 min An ordinary day As planned
Tue Easy run, 50 min Deadline. Five hours of sleep Cut to 30 min, easy
Wed Intervals, 60 min with 5 × 4 min hard A second short night Intervals dropped, not moved to later in the week. 30 min easy instead
Thu Easy ride, 60 min Afternoon flight for work Day off. A long walk on arrival
Fri Rest Away, meetings until evening Easy run, 35 min, seeing the city. The rest day already happened on Thursday
Sat Long ride, 2 h 30 Home late Friday, tired 1 h 30, all easy
Sun Easy run, 70 min Slept well As planned. Nothing added to make up

Planned: 7 h 10one hard session

Done: just under 5 hno hard session, one day off

Nothing that matters was lost. The base is intact, the habit of moving is intact, and there's no hole to climb out of next week. The intervals come back next Wednesday as if this week had been ordinary, because for an adult life, it was.

What the research doesn't tell us

Most of the studies above were done on young men, on competitive athletes, or in a single sport. Almost none follow a 45-year-old who runs, rides and skis around a job and a family. The running cohort is the closest match, and even it covers one sport.

So the evidence sets the frame, and the details inside it come from judgement: yours about how you feel, and ours about what that means for this particular week. That's what the correspondence is for.

For how easy and hard sessions fit together in an ordinary week, see the Norwegian method, without the Olympic hours.

Sources

Where an older study is cited, it's because nothing newer has replaced it. Links go to the original papers.

  1. Stults-Kolehmainen MA, Bartholomew JB, Sinha R. Chronic psychological stress impairs recovery of muscular function and somatic sensations over a 96-hour period. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(7):2007–2017. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000335
  2. Tranaeus U, Gledhill A, Johnson U, et al. 50 years of research on the psychology of sport injury: a consensus statement. Sports Med. 2024;54(7):1733–1748. doi:10.1007/s40279-024-02045-w
  3. Saw AE, Main LC, Gastin PB. Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):281–291. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094758
  4. Craven J, McCartney D, Desbrow B, et al. Effects of acute sleep loss on physical performance: a systematic and meta-analytical review. Sports Med. 2022;52(11):2669–2690. doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01706-y
  5. Düking P, et al. Monitoring and adapting endurance training on the basis of heart rate variability monitored by wearable technologies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2021. jsams.org
  6. Manresa-Rocamora A, et al. Heart rate variability-guided training for enhancing cardiac-vagal modulation, aerobic fitness, and endurance performance: a methodological systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10299. PMC8507742
  7. Spiering BA, Mujika I, Sharp MA, Foulis SA. Maintaining physical performance: the minimal dose of exercise needed to preserve endurance and strength over time. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(5):1449–1458. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003964
  8. Hickson RC, Kanakis C, Davis JR, Moore AM, Rich S. Reduced training duration effects on aerobic power, endurance, and cardiac growth. J Appl Physiol. 1982;53(1):225–229. doi:10.1152/jappl.1982.53.1.225
  9. Buyalskaya A, Ho H, Milkman KL, et al. What can machine learning teach us about habit formation? Evidence from exercise and hygiene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(17):e2216115120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2216115120
  10. Hickson RC, Foster C, Pollock ML, Galassi TM, Rich S. Reduced training intensities and loss of aerobic power, endurance, and cardiac growth. J Appl Physiol. 1985;58(2):492–499. doi:10.1152/jappl.1985.58.2.492
  11. Schuster Brandt Frandsen J, Hulme A, Parner ET, et al. How much running is too much? Identifying high-risk running sessions in a 5200-person cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2025;59(17):1203–1210. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2024-109380
  12. Zheng J, Pan T, Jiang Y, Shen Y. Effects of short- and long-term detraining on maximal oxygen uptake in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:2130993. doi:10.1155/2022/2130993
  13. Barbieri A, Fuk A, Gallo G, et al. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic consequences of detraining in endurance athletes. Front Physiol. 2024;14:1334766. doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1334766
  14. Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. The impact of loading, unloading, ageing and injury on the human tendon. J Physiol. 2019;597(5):1283–1298. doi:10.1113/JP275450
  15. Schwellnus M, Adami PE, Bougault V, et al. International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on acute respiratory illness in athletes part 1: acute respiratory infections. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56:1066–1088. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2022-105759
  16. Snyders C, Pyne DB, Sewry N, et al. Acute respiratory illness and return to sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis by a subgroup of the IOC consensus on "acute respiratory illness in the athlete". Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(4):223–232. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-104719
  17. Snyders C, et al. Increased number of symptoms during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection in athletes is associated with prolonged time to return to full sports performance (AWARE VIII). J Sport Health Sci. 2024. doaj.org
  18. Janse van Rensburg DC, Jansen van Rensburg A, Fowler PM, et al. Managing travel fatigue and jet lag in athletes: a review and consensus statement. Sports Med. 2021;51(10):2029–2050. doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01502-0